Review: ARTS PDF's Nitro PDF Desktop may find a niche in the office market, but it certainly doesn't deliver what publishers need.You're a publisher. When you want to build pages, you use publishing tools, not office tools. This, in a nutshell, is the problem with ARTS PDF's Nitro PDF Desktop. While it's a competent office tool for creating and using PDFs"designed and priced specifically for the business user" is how the company puts itit doesn't have the right stuff for publishers. There isn't even a Macintosh version.
ARTS PDF promotes the program as a competitor to Adobe Acrobat Standard. This is a fair fight (which it will still lose on most cards), but it's like touting a big punch-up with the champ's sparring partner. For publishing professionals, the comparison that matters is against Acrobat Professional, and here it's no contest.
Nitro PDF's $99 price tag (compared with $299 for Acrobat Standard and $449 for Acrobat Pro) is good for a product of its capabilities. It creates PDFs of comparable on-screen quality and size to those made by Acrobat. And although it's one version of the PDF spec (now at 1.6) behind Acrobat 7.0, so is the rest of the world.
How Nitro Works
Using the Nitro PDF Driver as your printer, you can print PDFs to disk from any program. The icons of files from popular office programs such as Word and Excel (but not publishing programs such as XPress or InDesign), can be dropped onto Nitro PDF's program icon to achieve the same end. Nitro's controls over the "distilling" process are a good subset of Acrobat Distiller's, and as in Acrobat, you can save these settings as output profiles for later reuse.
PDFzone's Don Fluckinger sees Nitro as welcome competition for Adobe Systems. Click here to read his column.
Nitro PDF also has basic markup, annotation, watermarking, security and content editing (both text and graphics) tools. Importantly, it has tools for creating forms, which Acrobat Standard doesn't; Adobe reserves that for Acrobat Professional. Even Acrobat Standard, though, provides a range of powerful and useful extras that most publishers will want, including collaborative tools for workgroup publishing and document review, as well as Web Capture, which allows you to save Web pages or entire Web sites as PDF files. In addition, Acrobat's search tools extend to attachments andsignificantlymetadata within PDF files.
When compared to Acrobat Professional, Nitro PDF fares poorly. It can't create color separations, for example, and it doesn't support any color management systems. It can't control or switch among color spaces. There's no pre-flighting, no ability to create JDF tickets, and no support for publishing standards such as the various flavors of PDF-X. There's no facility for adding crop or registration marks. File all this under "you get what you pay for."
Using Nitro PDF
Nitro PDF is fairly easy to use, once you know how to use it. But there's the rub. The program comes with a five-page "help" file that's no help at all. The program's manual exists online, and it's skimpy and hard to navigate. (Curiously, it's in HTML format, not PDF, so it's not downloadable.) There's no search facility, no index, not even any links among its sections. It's really quite bad, and it wastes a lot of your time.
An interesting innovation in Nitro PDF is the ability to create a PDF file from scratch, from a blank page. (Oddly, though, you can't specify a page size). But since Nitro gives you no page layout tools other than a layout grid, you have to ask why you'd do this in the first place. Without rulers or ruler guides, there's no way to place or size anything precisely. The only way to get an object onto such a page is with cut-and-paste.
Click here to view two slides of Nitro
In fact, you can cut any object from another program and paste it into a PDF page, which can be very useful. The new object simply sits on top of the existing page image, so integrating it into the layout may not always work in the absence of page layout tools such as those that control stacking order. You can also use cut-and-paste to export images from a PDF file, which is also very sensible idea.
Any object on a PDF page in Nitro can be rotated using a handle that appears on the object frame when selected. You can rescale placed images by dragging a corner point, but strangely, although holding down the Control key constrains the image's proportions, the effect isn't visible in the outline of the image box as it's being draggedyou can't see what your scaled image will look like until you've released the mouse button. It's a nice feature that is badly implemented.
Next Page: Text editing should not be so difficult.
In general, this is a program that feels rushed to market, with too many gaps, loose ends and bugs, such as the way it blocks the automatic pop-up action of the Windows Task Bar when it's set to Auto-Hide. (ARTS PDF has promised future fixes to the problems I asked about, but that doesn't help today. The company has scheduled an update release for July.)
Features of the program that look good on paper are often not so great in reality. To give you a sense of this, let's use Nitro to edit some text in a sample PDF file. You choose the Text Edit tool with its I-beam cursor and select text in the normal way. Now let's change the typeface. Right-click on the selected text to access a pop-up interactive list of the text's propertiesvery nice. Let's the change the typeface using another installed font, say, Adobe Garamond. But where is it? It doesn't appear in the pop-up font list because Nitro PDF doesn't support editing using OpenType (.otf) fonts. So let's try Bitstream's American Garamond. Sorry, PostScript Type 1 fonts don't appear either, for the same reason. OK, let's try good old TrueType Arial. Whoops. We're warned that we can't do that either because Arial's font encoding doesn't match that of the currently used embedded font, Rotis Sans. None of this appears in the manual. All of these things work perfectly well in the current version of Acrobat.
One more thing: Although ARTS PDF claims that the minimum recommended platform for the program is a Pentium II PC with a 233MHz clock speed, when I tested the program on an old IBM Pentium II with a 350MHz processor, it was so slow that it was essentially unusable. For most publishers, this won't be an issue, but any potential home users should take note. The much bulkier Acrobat 7 Professional performed adequately on the same machine.
Conclusion
ARTS PDF is touting their competition with Adobe and Acrobat as "The PDF Wars." But they're rushing to battle ill-armed. Nitro PDF is based on the very competent PDF engine created by Japan's Zeon Corp, but this implementation feels slapdash. ARTS PDF notes that it's out for a slice of what it calls the "$1-billion PDF market," and it can thrive as a company with a small slice of that pie. But it's not going to get it from the publishing community, who need more than Nitro PDF offers.