Why change the same information in a lot of places if you can do it once and let the same correction appear wherever it's needed? Your guess is as good as ours, but not as good as
Knowledge Center contributor Eric Severson, who explains how to use component-based authoring in your business and how much time and effort you'll save in the process.Do
you remember what the world was like before word processing? In that
dark recess of the stone age, documents were written with typewriters.
Administrative assistants still took dictation. If you wanted a simple
document or a report to look professional, you took a trip to the local
typesetting shop. If you wanted to actually publish something, you talked to a printing and publishing company.
What a revolution, then, when tools such as Microsoft Word and Adobe
FrameMaker came on the scene in the mid-1980s. Suddenly, it became
possible to produce your own documents—and to make them look good.
As WYSIWYG interfaces evolved, you could see exactly how your document
would appear in print. You could change its format to your liking with
a simple point and click. It's no wonder that these tools have since
become the favorite of authors everywhere and a fixture in the industry.
Instantaneous communication is now expected
But the world has changed since the early 1980s. Our needs are being
driven by different forces now. Professional-looking, printed documents
still have their place, but they're no longer the primary way people
communicate. We now live in an online world dominated by e-mail, Web
sites, wikis and blogs. This online world is being inhabited by users
with increasingly less patience for printed documents. With
expectations driven by Google and the Web, we expect to find instantly
available, relevant and up-to-date information—through devices we can
carry in our pockets and hold in our hands.
As easy and familiar as they are, today's WYSIWYG authoring tools
were not designed to support this new world. Helping you control the
way a document will look in print doesn't count for much if your
primary publishing channels are dynamic Web sites and feeds to handheld
devices. Plus, if the real need for your readers is to get right to the
topic they need, writing large print documents would seem to be missing
the point.
Read the rest of this article on eWEEK.com.